London SE1 community website

17 Restaurant ?

Join in these discussions today! Log in or register.
Wednesday 11 June 2003 9.42am
Ok...

I give up.

Does anyone have any idea what No. 17 around the corner from the Market Porter (Stoney Street) where someone has converted one of the original archways beneath the traintracks? Currently there is a carved "17" in the stone work and if you peak inside there is a nice loft, wood floors and track lighting.

Is it a new Jamie Oliver joint to compliment No. 15?

I really hope they take advantage of the location as the Borough Market is being revamped. Hopefully they add a nice outdoor dining area out the back of it too... (if it isn't someone's ritzy flat)

Wednesday 11 June 2003 11.23am
Oh, as someone with a bad head for figures, I hope there isn't a rash of restaurants known only by a number. "Could I have a table for 6 at 15 for 9:30? No? Try the 17 down the road? ok, how to get there? take the 78 bus".

On the other hand, why is Jamie Oliver's place called 15 when 2 of the original 15 dropped out? Or does 15 refer to the number of months you have to wait for a table?
Wednesday 11 June 2003 1.58pm
The actual address is 17 Park Street. The side where the glass enclosure has been made in the arch is on Redcross Way.

I just hope it doesn't turn into someones fancy pancy office or something. It would have been much nicer for it to be some local restaurant/bar.

I'm sure by summer it will all be revealed...
Wednesday 11 June 2003 3.39pm
I think planning permission was given for office use as I recall.

To post a message, please log in or register..
September at a glance
Keep up with SE1 news

We have three email newsletters for you to choose from:

We are part of
Independent Community News Network
Email newsletter

For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.

7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?

Read the latest issue before signing up

Also on the forum
Views expressed in this discussion forum are those of the contributors and may not reflect the editorial policy of this website. Please read our terms and conditions